The strange case of Deusdedit and Pandulf: two accounts of honorius iI's election

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this essay is to illustrate how and why the election of Pope Honorius II (1124-1130) was depicted in two opposing versions, each focus- ing on elements not found in the other. From Cardinal Deusdedit’s letter dated early 1125, it seems nothing worth mentioning happened during the election. Cardinal Pandulf’s account included in the Liber Pontif icalis in the Tortosa manuscript, written between 1133 and 1138, on the other hand, shows lay violence playing a signif icant role. The chapter will consider the extent to which Pandulf’s involvement in the schism following the death of Honorius and his support for Anacletus II played a part in his hostility towards the dead Pope and why, arguing that Pandulf ’s text represented an attack on the election of Innocent II, Anacletus’s rival.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationConflict and violence in medieval Italy 568-1154
EditorsChristopher Heath, Robert Houghton
PublisherTaylor and Francis AS
Chapter10
Pages299-323
Number of pages25
ISBN (Electronic)9781040790373
ISBN (Print)9781041177357
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2025

Keywords

  • Anacletus II
  • Honorius II
  • Innocent II
  • Pandulf
  • Papal election
  • Violence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The strange case of Deusdedit and Pandulf: two accounts of honorius iI's election'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this