Time-shifted morality: a critique of the legal discourse on online copyright infringement

Tito Rendas*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)


The article critically examines the discourse against the widespread practice of unauthorized sharing of copyrighted content on the Internet. Legal discourse condemning this behavior and trying to persuade Internet users of its moral unacceptability relies on a rhetoric that lacks resonance and credibility: the ‘download as theft’ rhetoric. It is argued that this reliance is explained by an indifference to the fact that the deeply embedded norm against theft that we hold is maladaptive in the contemporary technological predicament. To explicate this, the article uses the concept of ‘time-shifted morality’. The article’s hope is to serve as a stimulus for scholars and legal decision-makers to reconsider the rhetoric used in writing and arguing about online copyright infringement.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)28-45
Number of pages18
JournalQueen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015


  • Copyright
  • File sharing
  • Intellectual property
  • Internet law
  • Legal rhetoric
  • Morality
  • Online copyright infringement


Dive into the research topics of 'Time-shifted morality: a critique of the legal discourse on online copyright infringement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this