Tribunal Arquidiocesano de Braga, Decreto de segunda instância de 23 de janeiro de 2014

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The sentence, when scrolling through the evaluation criteria of the grave defect of discretion of judgment (can. 1095, 2), with attention to the psychic maturity and freedom necessary to validly celebrate marriage, in the light of the authentic Magisterium and of the accredited doctrine, exposes the principles that must guide a fair judgment. In this perspective, it faces the question of knowledge and psychic dynamism about a truly matrimonial decision, ending up criticizing the expert report and its conclusions. Also relevant is the possible coordination between the nullity chapters of grave defect of discretion and of fear
    Original languagePortuguese
    Pages (from-to)147-158
    Number of pages11
    JournalForum Canonicum
    Volume2020
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 22 Apr 2021

    Cite this