Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to ask why poor performance management practices persist in Portugal, in the middle of claims to increase productivity. Design/methodology/approach: An inductive micro-practice analysis is used to understand barriers to management practice that do not require massive institutional changes. Findings: The practice of performance management in Portugal typically displays three weaknesses: (1) insufficient planning (2) process and integrity issues, and (3) a non-meritocratic logic. Research limitations/implications: The paper discusses the important topic of persistence of bad practices, showing how institutionalized patterns might be difficult to eradicate even they are suboptimal. Practical implications: The authors identity key issues in the functioning of performance management, therefore helping managers in developing remedies to improve the quality of their practice. Originality/value: The paper explains the persistence of bad management practice whose continuity hinders not only organizations’ effectiveness but also that of their members.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 673-692 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management |
Volume | 67 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Keywords
- Management practices in society
- Meritocracy
- Performance management
- Portugal
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Why does performance management not perform?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Prizes
-
Outstanding Paper, 2019 Emerald Literati Awards
Cunha, M. P. E. (Recipient), Vieira, D. V. (Recipient), Rego, A. (Recipient) & Clegg, S. R. (Recipient), 2019
Prize