Why vote? A reflection on the democratic nature of dialogical inquiries

Joana Rita Sousa*, Pieter Mostert

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

In the inquiriesInquiry, as practiced in the P4wCPhilosophy for/with Children (P4wC)community, votingVote/Voting is a common feature: after the stimulusStimulus (usually a story or a picture), the students get the opportunity to bring forward the philosophical questions they would like to explore. One of these questions is selected by a voteVote/Voting. Arguments for voting as a procedure are practical (it is a quick way to come to a decision) and political (choosing the question shows that the students are in charge; they are the owners of the inquiryInquiry). The current practices of voting generate a number of important questions, both from the perspective of democracyDemocracy and of reasonablenessReasonableness. Among others, we will argue that the practice that voting equals “the majority decides” does not take the rights of the minority into consideration. We will recommend a more comprehensive look at the use of votingVote/Voting from the perspective of ownershipOwnership by the students.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationIntegrated science
EditorsMarella Ada V. Mancenido-Bolaños, Cathlyne Joy P. Alvarez-Abarejo, Leander Penaso Marquez
PublisherSpringer Nature
Pages39-56
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9789819941988
ISBN (Print)9789819942008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Sept 2023

Publication series

NameIntegrated Science
Volume17
ISSN (Print)2662-9461
ISSN (Electronic)2662-947X

Keywords

  • Community of inquiry
  • Consensus
  • Dialogue
  • Dissent
  • Fairness
  • Ownership
  • Polling

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why vote? A reflection on the democratic nature of dialogical inquiries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this