Abstract
The occurrence of a harmful event does not always only result in disadvantages for the injured party, but it can also bring advantages. In fact, when a certain harmful event brings certain advantages to the injured party, it is debated whether these advantages should be deducted from the quantum of compensation to be paid by the injured party, by virtue of the principle of compensatio lucri cum damno. This discussion, which originated in Civil Law, has gradually been brought into the field of the Administrative Law. However, it is not clear that this principle can be applied to the Pre-Contractual Civil Liability of Contracting Authorities. Therefore, the first part of this research begins by addressing the issue of the Pre-Contractual Civil Liability of Contracting Authorities, the principle of compensatio lucri cum damno and the respective admissibility of this principle in the context of Administrative Law. The second stage of this research concerns the admissibility of this principle in the context of the Pre-Contractual Civil Liability of Contracting Authorities, with a special focus on the case of unlawful rejection of a competitor in a public tender procedure and other similar cases.| Date of Award | 9 Dec 2024 |
|---|---|
| Original language | Portuguese |
| Awarding Institution |
|
| Supervisor | Rui Medeiros (Supervisor) |
UN SDGs
This student thesis contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Compensatio lucri cum damno
- Damages
- Benefits
- Pre-contractual civil liability
- Compensation
- Contracting authorities
- Deduction of the benefits
- Competitor
Designation
- Mestrado em Direito
Cite this
- Standard