Abstract
The present dissertation is about a subject of great pertinence: the Resolution tothe Benefit of the Insolvent State. I intend to do a general analysis of the regime, both conditional and unconditional, with an extended depth line concerning this last one and, forcibly, to the various items of CIRE art 121. We will go on with a comparative analysis face the CPEREF regime, concretizing the essential changes. We also have a reference to the general means of preserving the equity guarantee, among which we highlight the Pauline Impugnation, an institute that throughout this study will be compared to the Resolution in Benefit of the Insolvent State, which will allow us to immediately conclude, by the accentuated innovation of the current regime, with the main highlight being the exclusion of the institute of Collective Pauline Impugnation.
Date of Award | 14 Nov 2017 |
---|---|
Original language | Portuguese |
Awarding Institution |
|
Supervisor | Maria do Rosário Epifânio (Supervisor) |
Keywords
- Insolvency process
- Creditor
- Debtor
- Insolvent state
- Resolution to the benefit of the insolvent state
- Conditional resolution
- Unconditional resolution
- General means of preserving the equity guarantee
- Pauline impugnation
Designation
- Mestrado em Direito