Abstract
In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court of Justice declared that, at the investigation stage, it is up to the preliminary judge to order or authorize the apprehension of electronic e-mails or other records of communications of a similar nature, regardless of whether they are open/read or closed/unread, which appear to be of great interest for the discovery of the truth or for evidence, under the terms of article 17 of the Cybercrime Law. However, the question arises as to what the practical consequences of this case law decision are. This dissertation deals with procedural issues inherent in the system for the capture of emails and similar communications, with particular emphasis on the problem of a possible distinction between open or read emails and closed or unread emails, in the light of Supreme Court Ruling n.º 10/2023.| Date of Award | 5 Sept 2025 |
|---|---|
| Original language | Portuguese |
| Awarding Institution |
|
| Supervisor | Henrique Salinas (Supervisor) |
UN SDGs
This student thesis contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
Keywords
- Criminal procedure law
- Evidence
- Apprehension
- E-mails and similar communications
Designation
- Mestrado em Direito
Cite this
- Standard