Abstract
Within the scope of the controversy about the strick liability in the context of road accidents and the conduct of the injured, the jurisprudential contribution varies, being a turning point the decision of Supremo Tribunal de Justiça of 04.10.2007, by influence of the European Law and Jurisprudence, mainly, by the intention to concede protection to the most vulnerable victims. With the present study, an attempt is made to typify the situations considered by our courts as dissuasive of the application of the established in article 505.º in conjunction with the article 507.º of Código Civil, in its traditional interpretation.| Date of Award | 3 Jul 2024 |
|---|---|
| Original language | Portuguese |
| Awarding Institution |
|
| Supervisor | José Carlos Barros Brandão Proença (Supervisor) |
UN SDGs
This student thesis contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Strick liability
- Contributory negligence and comparative negligence
- Victim's fault
Designation
- Mestrado em Direito
Cite this
- Standard