Abstract
A low audit quality associated with misleading financial statements can have severe consequences in the financial markets, leading to increasing concerns among stakeholders who seek reliable financial statements from companies. Consequently, understanding the determinants that affect the quality of an audit has become an extremely important issue for the financial information users (Salehi et al., 2019). It is worth noting that there has always been a debate between larger and smaller auditing firms (Big 4 or Non-Big 4) regarding which presents better audit quality. In this sense, this dissertation aims to analyze whether there is a relationship between the size of the auditor and the quality of the audit in Portugal. In order to quantify earnings manipulation (EM), the Modified Jones Model was used, estimating the discretionary accruals, and a linear regression based on the Lawrence, et al. (2011) equation. The sample consists of 16,540 companies for the period from 2020 to 2022, inclusive. The results obtained show evidence that Portuguese companies audit by Big 4 exhibit more earnings manipulations than Portuguese companies audit by Non-Big 4.| Date of Award | 18 Dec 2024 |
|---|---|
| Original language | Portuguese |
| Awarding Institution |
|
| Supervisor | Maria José Martins Lourenço da Fonseca (Supervisor) & Ricardo Ribeiro (Co-Supervisor) |
UN SDGs
This student thesis contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Auditing
- Audit quality
- Auditor size
- Earnings management
- Discretionary accruals
Designation
- Mestrado em Auditoria e Fiscalidade
Cite this
- Standard