Abstract
Administrative silence has become a prominent feature of modern Comparative Administrative Law, with legal effects increasingly being attributed to administrative decisional inaction, particularly in favor of the claims of private applicants. While it may seem strange that administrative inertia should be conducive to the emergence of legal effects in the sphere of individuals, especially in light of a principle of expressed procedural administrative decision-making, it is no longer unknown that the legislator frequently uses the institute of tacit approval to overcome the drawbacks of administrative silence, betting on administrative simplification and debureaucratization to achieve social and economic objectives. The question that arises in this paper is whether a tacit approval rule can be included as a ground for extinguishing any and all administrative proceedings for the formation of an act, or whether, on the contrary, there are domains forbidden to the enshrinement of the figure, cases in which the principles and procedural norms cannot be derogated by the constitution of a tacit approval, requiring that the Administration unconditionally ponder and decide. It is these latter that constitute our Procedural Reserve of Administration.| Date of Award | 12 Dec 2024 |
|---|---|
| Original language | Portuguese |
| Awarding Institution |
|
| Supervisor | Rui Medeiros (Supervisor) |
UN SDGs
This student thesis contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Administrative silence
- Tacit approval
- Administrative procedure
- Administrative decision
- Fundamental rights
- Administrative discretion
- Urban planning law
- Environmental law
Designation
- Mestrado em Direito
Cite this
- Standard