This dissertation investigates the perceptions and preferences of individuals towards AIdriven coaching as opposed to human coaching in the fitness sector. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the potential impact of AI coaching on exercise motivation, perceived convenience, and concerns regarding injury prevention and posture. Furthermore, the paper explores the potential for AI to completely replace human coaches in the future, considering the advantages and constraints of AI. A survey was conducted with 146 participants to assess participants' perceptions and preferences for both AI and human coaching approaches. The findings indicate that in spite of the perceived convenience and accessibility of AI-based coaching, participants continue to consider human coaches as more effective in motivating people to exercise and providing customized interactions. Regarding the future of AI in the field of fitness, the results indicate that participants expect that AI will not entirely substitute human trainers. Although AI is considered a useful complement, the ability of human trainers to offer empathy, personalized instruction, and emotional support remains essential. The research findings indicate that artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to improve fitness coaching, but it is unlikely that AI will completely replace human trainers in the years to come.
- Artificial intelligence
- AI-based coaching
- Human-based coaching
- Motivation
- Convenience
- Injury prevention
Perceptions and preferences towards AI and human coaching in fitness
Meneses, F. M. N. M. D. S. E. (Student). 16 Oct 2024
Student thesis: Master's Thesis