Family firms enjoy increased consumer trust due to their perceived integrity and long-term orientation. However, whether this trust advantage holds or makes them more vulnerable to reputational damage remains unclear. This thesis investigates how reputational harm affects consumer trust, brand attitude, and purchase intention and whether these effects differ between family-owned and non-family-owned businesses. The thesis uses an experimental design with 160 participants across four conditions and combines a two-way ANOVA and moderated mediation analysis (PROCESS Model 7 by Hayes) to test the hypothesized relationships. Results show that reputational damage significantly reduces consumer trust and purchasing intention, regardless of ownership type. Trust was found to partially mediate this relationship, however the mediation was not significantly stronger for family-owned firms. These findings challenge assumptions taken from Socioemotional Wealth Theory and Attribution Theory, and suggest that reputational issues may create equally strong consumer reactions no matter the firm type. Limitations and future research directions are discussed with a call for broader cross-industry studies.
- Family firms
- Reputational damage
- Consumer trust
- Purchase intention
- Socioemotional wealth
- Mestrado em Gestão e Administração de Empresas
The role of ownership type in consumer reactions to reputational damage
Sander, L. A. (Student). 1 Jul 2025
Student thesis: Master's Thesis