Abstract
In the complex arena of international conflicts, the Palestinian-Israeli dispute emerges as a compelling narrative marked by a historical accusation filled with legal maneuvers and geopolitical tensions. From territorial claims to South Africa’s advocacy for Palestinian rights before the ICJ, each aspect reveals layers of complexity in the ongoing conflict. Notably, the ICJ’s first and recent provisional measures indicate a nuanced understanding of the conflict’s evolving dynamics, reflecting the Court’s pivotal role in navigating global tensions. While refraining from a definitive ruling on genocide, the Court’s acknowledgment of the plausibility of South Africa’s claims underscores the magnitude of the situation. Simultaneously, the ICC emerges as a crucial arbiter of justice, transcending political pressures to uphold accountability. However, the challenge of demonstrating intent in cases involving states poses a significant obstacle, prompting critical reflections on the application of international law in such sensible scenarios. This dispute, reminiscent of a global broadcast of atrocity, compels us to confront the darkest chapters of history and reaffirms the imperative of seeking justice and protecting civilian populations.| Date of Award | 16 Jul 2024 |
|---|---|
| Original language | English |
| Awarding Institution |
|
| Supervisor | José Azeredo Lopes (Supervisor) |
UN SDGs
This student thesis contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- South Africa
- Israel
- International court of justice
- Jurisdiction
- Provisional measures
- International criminal court
- Genocide
- Intent
Designation
- Mestrado em Direito
Cite this
- Standard