As we begin by documenting, for more than three quarters of a century, both proponents and critics of the category of totalitarianism, whatever their claims, ended up repeating the very same analytical argument on what motivations, dynamics, outcomes and horizons would define a totalitarian regime – a type of regime, so goes such argument, irrevocably condemned to self-destruction. By upgrading and applying historical-comparative research methodology to the cases of Stalinism and Nazism, we prove such an argument to be, for the most part, lacking in historical-empirical grounding; and formulate an alternative interpretation of the essence of totalitarian rule that, for its grounding and freshness, could breathe new life into the mostly ossified study of the subject.
Date of Award | 16 Dec 2019 |
---|
Original language | Portuguese |
---|
Awarding Institution | - Universidade Católica Portuguesa
|
---|
Supervisor | Miguel Morgado (Supervisor) |
---|
- Doutoramento em Ciência Política e Relações Internacionais: Segurança e Defesa
Visão, velocidade, vertigem e violência: a mobilização total para a vitória final como essência do regime totalitário
Varajidás, H. (Author). 16 Dec 2019
Student thesis: Doctoral Thesis