TY - JOUR
T1 - A multi-criteria approach to decision making in broadband technology selection
AU - Araújo, Marco
AU - Ekenberg, Love
AU - Danielson, Mats
AU - Confraria, João
N1 - Funding Information:
Over the years, the European Union (EU) has addressed the equality of access to technological benefits among its citizens, where social welfare has been emphasised in the sense that no EU citizens should be left behind from a communications perspective. Previous regulatory frameworks granted citizens in unprofitable areas (typically rural) access to basic services in the framework of universal service obligations (e.g. narrowband Internet access and fixed telephone services) only. However, in 2016, the European Commission proposed a new regulatory framework for the telecom sector–the European Electronic Communications Code – which was adopted in late 2018 by the Council and the European Parliament and should have been transposed to national laws by the member states by December 21, 2020, at the latest (by 2025, the Directive and universal service are to be evaluated and reviewed). The objective is to guarantee that most citizens will have access to very fast Internet connections with a download capacity of 100 Mbps, regardless of where they live (European Parliament ). The EECC thus aims to reduce or eliminate the digital divide by setting in motion the European Commission’s (EC) ambitious goal of providing 100 Mbps broadband mass coverage also in areas or regions of the Union in which operators do not have commercial incentives for deploying networks capable of such a throughput. There will, therefore, be a governmental responsibility in cases where the market does not deliver to use public funds to support investment in these areas incentivising economic efficiency with the enforcement of a set of rules and policies. Governments can use financial instruments such as those available under the European Fund for Strategic Investments and Connecting Europe Facility, as well as public funding from the European structural and investment funds (recital 229 of the EECC). Governments should use EU funding alongside national public budgets to fully fund the deployment of the infrastructure, even when the deployment begins before the end of 2025.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/4
Y1 - 2022/4
N2 - A new European Union regulatory framework for the telecom sector has been under a process of transposition to national laws by its member states that should have been completed by the end of 2020, notwithstanding some delays. A core purpose of the regulatory framework is to guarantee that most citizens will have access to very fast Internet connections, capable of 100 Mbps download link speed, regardless of where they live. According to this new framework, in areas where the market does not deliver, governments are to launch public tenders for the deployment, maintenance, and operations of network infrastructure as well as services, and public funds should be used to support the deployment of these broadband networks in less densely populated areas. Needless to say, public tenders of this nature are subject to different criteria when it comes to candidate evaluation. In this paper, we present a decision model for the selection of operators to deploy and maintain broadband networks in scarcely populated areas, taking into consideration infrastructure costs, the technical quality offered by the solutions, and the credibility of the candidates. We suggest an integrated multi-stakeholder multi-criteria approach and demonstrate how it can be used in this complex area and find that in the example provided, taking a relevant set of criteria into the analysis, optical fibre networks hold much higher chances to be used in these public tenders compared to networks based on the broadly favoured 5G technology.
AB - A new European Union regulatory framework for the telecom sector has been under a process of transposition to national laws by its member states that should have been completed by the end of 2020, notwithstanding some delays. A core purpose of the regulatory framework is to guarantee that most citizens will have access to very fast Internet connections, capable of 100 Mbps download link speed, regardless of where they live. According to this new framework, in areas where the market does not deliver, governments are to launch public tenders for the deployment, maintenance, and operations of network infrastructure as well as services, and public funds should be used to support the deployment of these broadband networks in less densely populated areas. Needless to say, public tenders of this nature are subject to different criteria when it comes to candidate evaluation. In this paper, we present a decision model for the selection of operators to deploy and maintain broadband networks in scarcely populated areas, taking into consideration infrastructure costs, the technical quality offered by the solutions, and the credibility of the candidates. We suggest an integrated multi-stakeholder multi-criteria approach and demonstrate how it can be used in this complex area and find that in the example provided, taking a relevant set of criteria into the analysis, optical fibre networks hold much higher chances to be used in these public tenders compared to networks based on the broadly favoured 5G technology.
KW - Broadband technologies
KW - DecideIT decision tool
KW - MAVT
KW - Multiple criteria decision making
KW - Procurement
KW - Real options
KW - Surrogate weights
KW - Telecom operator selection problem
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122393299&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10726-021-09772-9
DO - 10.1007/s10726-021-09772-9
M3 - Article
SN - 0926-2644
VL - 31
SP - 387
EP - 418
JO - Group Decision and Negotiation
JF - Group Decision and Negotiation
IS - 2
ER -