TY - JOUR
T1 - Coopetition and innovation
T2 - a review and research agenda
AU - Corbo, Leonardo
AU - Kraus, Sascha
AU - Vlačić, Božidar
AU - Dabić, Marina
AU - Caputo, Andrea
AU - Pellegrini, Massimiliano M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Professor Marina Dabić This research has received funding from the Horizon 2020 Programme of the European Union within the OpenInnoTrain project, under grant agreement no. 823971. The content of this publication does not reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Responsibility for the information and views expressed in this publication lies entirely with the author(s). Assistant Prof. Bozidar Vlačić would like to thank the scientific collaboration under the National Funds from FCT - Fundaç~ao para a Ci^encia e a Tecnologia project UIDB/00731/2020 and Spanish national funds project PID2019-106677GB-I00 of the Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain.Despite these potential drawbacks, an abundance of empirical and anecdotal evidence supports the idea that innovation-related coopetition is beneficial for firms involved in such activities. An exemplary case of collaboration between competitors orientated towards technological innovation is the LCD TV collaboration between Sony and Samsung. Sony contributed its brand recognition in the television domain and its technological know-how, while Samsung contributed with its know-how in LCD technology (Gnyawali and Park, 2011). The edX platform represents another interesting example of innovation-related coopetition, this time in the field of higher education. In 2012, two traditionally competing universities - Harvard and MIT - joined forces to build and launch one of the first virtual learning initiatives through a platform that would grant online access to their courses seamlessly. A more recent example is the collaboration between Apple and Google, which sought to create contact-tracing technology to combat the spread of COVID-19 (Brandenburger and Nalebuff, 2021).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/8/22
Y1 - 2022/8/22
N2 - The proliferation of research on innovation-related coopetition calls for a more unified understanding of the current state of knowledge in this domain. Previous reviews on coopetition, however, fall short when it comes to putting innovation at the core of their analysis, often relegating the topic to one of the research themes/dimensions of coopetition, or considering innovation to be a promising area for future research. We fill this gap by systematically reviewing two decades of research on coopetition and innovation. We apply Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) methods to a sample of 128 articles from academic journals published in the field of coopetition and innovation, revealing the major research themes, the theories and methods used, the levels of analysis, and the contexts explored. The holistic representation of coopetition and innovation research hinges upon multiple theories, including the resource-based view, the knowledge-based view, the network view, and the behavioral view, while predominantly focusing on strategy; innovativeness; value creation, appropriation and performance; appropriability and protection; and organizational culture. Given the increasing scholarly interest in both coopetition and innovation, this study proposes fruitful research avenues, and discusses their implications for both theory and practice.
AB - The proliferation of research on innovation-related coopetition calls for a more unified understanding of the current state of knowledge in this domain. Previous reviews on coopetition, however, fall short when it comes to putting innovation at the core of their analysis, often relegating the topic to one of the research themes/dimensions of coopetition, or considering innovation to be a promising area for future research. We fill this gap by systematically reviewing two decades of research on coopetition and innovation. We apply Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) methods to a sample of 128 articles from academic journals published in the field of coopetition and innovation, revealing the major research themes, the theories and methods used, the levels of analysis, and the contexts explored. The holistic representation of coopetition and innovation research hinges upon multiple theories, including the resource-based view, the knowledge-based view, the network view, and the behavioral view, while predominantly focusing on strategy; innovativeness; value creation, appropriation and performance; appropriability and protection; and organizational culture. Given the increasing scholarly interest in both coopetition and innovation, this study proposes fruitful research avenues, and discusses their implications for both theory and practice.
KW - Coopetition
KW - Innovation
KW - Systematic literature review
KW - Multiple correspondence analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137641230&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102624
DO - 10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102624
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85137641230
JO - Technovation
JF - Technovation
SN - 0166-4972
M1 - 102624
ER -