Is judicial restraint a matter of bright lines or of democratic deference?: a comment on Stavros Tsakyrakis’ ‘Justice Unrobed’

Gonçalo Manoel de Vilhena de Almeida Ribeiro

Is judicial restraint a matter of bright lines or of democratic deference? a comment on Stavros Tsakyrakis’ ‘Justice Unrobed’

Título traduzido da contribuição: A contenção judicial é uma questão de linhas de demarcação ou de deferência democrática?: um comentário a “Justiça Destogada” de Stavros Tsakyrakis

Gonçalo Manoel de Vilhena de Almeida Ribeiro

Faculdade de Direito

Resultado de pesquisa

16 Transferências (Pure)

Resumo

Prompted by Stavros Tsakyrakis Essay ‘Justice Unrobed’, this Comment argues against a theory of judicial review that divides legislative and judicial competence along substantive lines (civil rights v. social rights and matters of principle v. matters of policy) and in favor of one that asks constitutional adjudicators to defer to the legislature on democratic grounds.

Título traduzido da contribuição	A contenção judicial é uma questão de linhas de demarcação ou de deferência democrática?: um comentário a “Justiça Destogada” de Stavros Tsakyrakis
Idioma original	English
Revista	E-Pública
Estado da publicação	Publicado - 2017

Acesso ao documento

42860869Final published version, 421 KBLicença: Unspecified

Citação

@article{4b9a228ac4c64ac4870b3525352048d0,

title = "Is judicial restraint a matter of bright lines or of democratic deference?: a comment on Stavros Tsakyrakis{\textquoteright} {\textquoteleft}Justice Unrobed{\textquoteright}",

abstract = "Prompted by Stavros Tsakyrakis Essay {\textquoteleft}Justice Unrobed{\textquoteright}, this Comment argues against a theory of judicial review that divides legislative and judicial competence along substantive lines (civil rights v. social rights and matters of principle v. matters of policy) and in favor of one that asks constitutional adjudicators to defer to the legislature on democratic grounds. ",

keywords = "Categories of rights, Principle and policy, Judicial legitimacy, Democratic deference, Levels of scrutiny",

author = "Ribeiro, {Gon{\c c}alo Manoel de Vilhena de Almeida}",

year = "2017",

language = "English",

journal = "E-P{\'u}blica",

issn = "2183-184X",

publisher = "Instituto de Ci{\^e}ncias Jur{\'i}dico-Pol{\'i}ticas",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is judicial restraint a matter of bright lines or of democratic deference?

T2 - a comment on Stavros Tsakyrakis’ ‘Justice Unrobed’

AU - Ribeiro, Gonçalo Manoel de Vilhena de Almeida

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Prompted by Stavros Tsakyrakis Essay ‘Justice Unrobed’, this Comment argues against a theory of judicial review that divides legislative and judicial competence along substantive lines (civil rights v. social rights and matters of principle v. matters of policy) and in favor of one that asks constitutional adjudicators to defer to the legislature on democratic grounds.

AB - Prompted by Stavros Tsakyrakis Essay ‘Justice Unrobed’, this Comment argues against a theory of judicial review that divides legislative and judicial competence along substantive lines (civil rights v. social rights and matters of principle v. matters of policy) and in favor of one that asks constitutional adjudicators to defer to the legislature on democratic grounds.

KW - Categories of rights

KW - Principle and policy

KW - Judicial legitimacy

KW - Democratic deference

KW - Levels of scrutiny

M3 - Article

SN - 2183-184X

JO - E-Pública

JF - E-Pública

ER -

Is judicial restraint a matter of bright lines or of democratic deference? a comment on Stavros Tsakyrakis’ ‘Justice Unrobed’

Resumo

Acesso ao documento

Impressão digital

Citação