Laclau's new postmodern radicalism: politics, democracy, and the epistemology of certainty

Pedro Góis Moreira

Resultado de pesquisarevisão de pares

1 Citação (Scopus)

Resumo

A timeless critique holds that the radical is animated by a deep sense of certainty that leads to the worst excesses. By distinguishing essentialist and non-essentialist forms of radicalism, Ernesto Laclau offers a “coalitional” form of radicalism that, in effect, responds to this critique. Laclau deconstructs classical forms of radicalism, such as Marxism, to show how one can use some of their formal components, such as dichotomic rhetoric and a notion of utopia, without assuming that their particular content (e.g., the figure of the proletarian or the socialist utopia) entails the permanent abolition of oppression. Laclau’s radicalism enables political actors to build their own radical front by politicizing and creating linkages between issues. Laclau thus avoids the epistemic certainty of classical radicalisms. However, in the interest of politically effective radicalism, he deploys a localized form of certainty that has an ambivalent potential for intolerance and violence.
Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (de-até)244-278
Número de páginas35
RevistaCritical Review
Volume34
Número de emissão2
DOIs
Estado da publicaçãoPublicado - 5 mai. 2022

Impressão digital

Mergulhe nos tópicos de investigação de “Laclau's new postmodern radicalism: politics, democracy, and the epistemology of certainty“. Em conjunto formam uma impressão digital única.

Citação