New economic geography: history and debate

José M. Gaspar

doi:10.1080/09672567.2020.1767671

New economic geography: history and debate

José M. Gaspar^*

^*Autor correspondente para este trabalho

Resultado de pesquisa › revisão de pares

5 Citações (Scopus)

Resumo

We synthesise the main conceptual discussion around New Economic Geography (NEG). We provide the background in adjacent fields of economics which made the surge of NEG possible. We then assess the state of the art in NEG and track the intellectual evolution of the field, focussing on the intrinsic criticism that it has been subject to throughout its history. This criticism has its roots in different conceptions of geography and history, as well as other methodological differences between economists and geographers. We analyse the evolution of the debate and communication between geographical economists and economic geographers.

Idioma original	English
Páginas (de-até)	46-82
Número de páginas	37
Revista	European Journal of the History of Economic Thought
Volume	28
Número de emissão	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2020.1767671
Estado da publicação	Publicado - 2 jan 2021

Acesso ao documento

10.1080/09672567.2020.1767671

Outros arquivos e links

http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085562250&partnerID=8YFLogxK

1 Ativos

CEGE: Research Center in Management and Economics
Silva, M., Sousa, R., Alves, P., Madsen, A., Lourenço, A., Carvalho, A. S., Andrade, A., Silva, P. D., Vlačić, B., Martins, C., Gomes, C., Gevrek, Z. E., Oliveira, F. G. D., Faria, G., Marreiros, H., Pinho, J., Machado, J., Araújo, J., Pinto, J., Rego, A., Gaspar, J. M., Corbo, L., Costa, L., Fernandes, L., Sottomayor, M., Martins, N., Hernández-Marrero, P., Gonçalves, R., Ribeiro, R., Coelho, S. L., Pereira, S. M., Silva, S., Rodrigues, V., Sotiros, D. G., Valverde, C. J. L., Leitão, A., Julião, J., Tavares, M. F. F., Lages, C. R., Elmashhara, M. G. & Teymourifar, A.
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
1/01/20 → 31/12/23
Projeto

Citação

@article{aa93b4e0928441268858650bd4f386e1,

title = "New economic geography: history and debate",

abstract = "We synthesise the main conceptual discussion around New Economic Geography (NEG). We provide the background in adjacent fields of economics which made the surge of NEG possible. We then assess the state of the art in NEG and track the intellectual evolution of the field, focussing on the intrinsic criticism that it has been subject to throughout its history. This criticism has its roots in different conceptions of geography and history, as well as other methodological differences between economists and geographers. We analyse the evolution of the debate and communication between geographical economists and economic geographers.",

keywords = "Economic geography, Geography, History, N7, N9, New economic geography, Ontological debate, R12",

author = "Gaspar, {Jos{\'e} M.}",

note = "Funding Information: from Funda{\c c}{\~a}o para a Ci{\^e}ncia e Tecnologia [through projects UIDB/04105/2020, UIDB/00731/2020, PTDC/EGE-ECO/30080/2017 and CEECIND/02741/2017)] is gratefully acknowledged. I am thankful to Ant{\'o}nio Almodovar, three anonymous referees, and the Editor Richard Sturn for useful comments and suggestions. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",

year = "2021",

month = jan,

day = "2",

doi = "10.1080/09672567.2020.1767671",

language = "English",

volume = "28",

pages = "46--82",

journal = "European Journal of the History of Economic Thought",

issn = "0967-2567",

publisher = "Routledge",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - New economic geography

T2 - history and debate

AU - Gaspar, José M.

N1 - Funding Information: from Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia [through projects UIDB/04105/2020, UIDB/00731/2020, PTDC/EGE-ECO/30080/2017 and CEECIND/02741/2017)] is gratefully acknowledged. I am thankful to António Almodovar, three anonymous referees, and the Editor Richard Sturn for useful comments and suggestions. Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

PY - 2021/1/2

Y1 - 2021/1/2

N2 - We synthesise the main conceptual discussion around New Economic Geography (NEG). We provide the background in adjacent fields of economics which made the surge of NEG possible. We then assess the state of the art in NEG and track the intellectual evolution of the field, focussing on the intrinsic criticism that it has been subject to throughout its history. This criticism has its roots in different conceptions of geography and history, as well as other methodological differences between economists and geographers. We analyse the evolution of the debate and communication between geographical economists and economic geographers.

AB - We synthesise the main conceptual discussion around New Economic Geography (NEG). We provide the background in adjacent fields of economics which made the surge of NEG possible. We then assess the state of the art in NEG and track the intellectual evolution of the field, focussing on the intrinsic criticism that it has been subject to throughout its history. This criticism has its roots in different conceptions of geography and history, as well as other methodological differences between economists and geographers. We analyse the evolution of the debate and communication between geographical economists and economic geographers.

KW - Economic geography

KW - Geography

KW - History

KW - N7

KW - N9

KW - New economic geography

KW - Ontological debate

KW - R12

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085562250&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09672567.2020.1767671

DO - 10.1080/09672567.2020.1767671

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85085562250

VL - 28

SP - 46

EP - 82

JO - European Journal of the History of Economic Thought

JF - European Journal of the History of Economic Thought

SN - 0967-2567

IS - 1

ER -

New economic geography: history and debate

Resumo

Acesso ao documento

Outros arquivos e links

Impressão digital

Projetos

CEGE: Research Center in Management and Economics

Citação