TY - JOUR
T1 - Quality of facility-based maternal and newborn care around the time of childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic
T2 - online survey investigating maternal perspectives in 12 countries of the WHO European Region
AU - IMAgiNE EURO study group
AU - Lazzerini, Marzia
AU - Covi, Benedetta
AU - Mariani, Ilaria
AU - Drglin, Zalka
AU - Arendt, Maryse
AU - Nedberg, Ingvild Hersoug
AU - Elden, Helen
AU - Costa, Raquel
AU - Drandić, Daniela
AU - Radetić, Jelena
AU - Otelea, Marina Ruxandra
AU - Miani, Céline
AU - Brigidi, Serena
AU - Rozée, Virginie
AU - Ponikvar, Barbara Mihevc
AU - Tasch, Barbara
AU - Kongslien, Sigrun
AU - Linden, Karolina
AU - Barata, Catarina
AU - Kurbanović, Magdalena
AU - Ružičić, Jovana
AU - Batram-Zantvoort, Stephanie
AU - Castañeda, Lara Martín
AU - Rochebrochard, Elise de La
AU - Bohinec, Anja
AU - Vik, Eline Skirnisdottir
AU - Zaigham, Mehreen
AU - Santos, Teresa
AU - Wandschneider, Lisa
AU - Viver, Ana Canales
AU - Ćerimagić, Amira
AU - Sacks, Emma
AU - Valente, Emanuelle Pessa
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded by the Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste Italy.
Funding Information:
Céline Miani's position as a post-doctoral researcher is funded by Bielefeld University.
Funding Information:
We would like to thank all project partners and volunteer mothers who helped in the development of the questionnaire and all women who took their time to respond to this survey despite the burden of the COVID-19 pandemic. We also would like to thank a number of colleagues who volunteered in helping different aspects of the project, as follows: •Valbona Nushi-Stavileci who helped with survey translation into Albanian. •Aleksandra Wilk-Przybysz and Małgorzata (Meg) Mielczarek who helped with survey translation into Polish. •France: Marie-Laure Trudel, Sarah Féron, Gilles Garrouste who helped with the survey dissemination •Germany: Antonia Leiße, who helped with the survey translation into German and dissemination. •Italy: Rebecca Lundin for back translation of Italian questionnaires; Elisabetta Danielli from Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo for her technical support on upload and maintenance of questionnaire links on institutional webpage; Michele Bava from Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo for the IT support. •Portugal: Associação Portuguesa pelos Direitos da Mulher na Gravidez e Parto (APDMGP) for support on survey dissemination. •Norway: Marit Kongslien for back translation of Norwegian questionnaire. •Romania: Sinziana Ionita-Ciurez, Ana Maita, Cristina Biciila, Raluca Dumitrescu (members of SAMAS Association) for their commitment on the translation and on the Romanian questionnaire's dissemination. •Spain: Observatorio de la violencia obstetrica (OVO) - Spain, Medical Anthropology Research Center (MARC, URV) and Institut Català d'Antropologia (ICA) for support on survey dissemination. •Sweden: David Loum Skantz for his help in survey dissemination., This research was funded by the Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste Italy. Céline Miani's position as a post-doctoral researcher is funded by Bielefeld University. Catarina Barata had a PhD grant FCT/FSE (SFRH/BD/128600/2017) while she was voluntarily writing this article. She is board member, unpaid collaboration, of Associação Portuguesa pelos Direitos da Mulher na Gravidez e Parto (APDMGP). Daniela Drandić received a salary during the time she was volunteer-writing this article was from a grant from the Erasmus+ programme of the European Commission, regarding a project on parenting support and from a grant from the UNICEF Croatia, regarding a project on online education for pregnant women during COVID. She is a board member of an NGO called Human Rights in Childbirth, and has been for the entire time she worked on this paper. Dr Emma Sacks has received research funding from the World Health Organization related to the mistreatment of women and newborns in health facilities. The project has no impact on the present manuscript outside of similar topics. She is the former co-chair of the Newborn Health Working Group of the Global Respectful Maternity Care Council. Other authors have none to declare. Data can be made available on reasonable request to the corresponding author. The authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article and they do not necessarily represent the views, decisions or policies of the institutions with which they are affiliated.
Funding Information:
Daniela Drandić received a salary during the time she was volunteer-writing this article was from a grant from the Erasmus+ programme of the European Commission, regarding a project on parenting support and from a grant from the UNICEF Croatia, regarding a project on online education for pregnant women during COVID. She is a board member of an NGO called Human Rights in Childbirth, and has been for the entire time she worked on this paper.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s)
PY - 2022/2
Y1 - 2022/2
N2 - Background: Multi-country studies assessing the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) during the COVID-19 pandemic, as defined by WHO Standards, are lacking. Methods: Women who gave birth in 12 countries of the WHO European Region from March 1, 2020 - March 15, 2021 answered an online questionnaire, including 40 WHO Standard-based Quality Measures. Findings: 21,027 mothers were included in the analysis. Among those who experienced labour (N=18,063), 41·8% (26·1%- 63·5%) experienced difficulties in accessing antenatal care, 62% (12·6%-99·0%) were not allowed a companion of choice, 31·1% (16·5%-56·9%) received inadequate breastfeeding support, 34·4% (5·2%-64·8%) reported that health workers were not always using protective personal equipment, and 31·8% (17·8%-53·1%) rated the health workers’ number as “insufficient”. Episiotomy was performed in 20·1% (6·1%-66·0%) of spontaneous vaginal births and fundal pressure applied in 41·2% (11·5% -100%) of instrumental vaginal births. In addition, 23·9% women felt they were not treated with dignity (12·8%-59·8%), 12·5% (7·0%-23·4%) suffered abuse, and 2·4% (0·1%-26·2%) made informal payments. Most findings were significantly worse among women with prelabour caesarean birth (N=2,964). Multivariate analyses confirmed significant differences among countries, with Croatia, Romania, Serbia showing significant lower QMNC Indexes and Luxemburg showing a significantly higher QMNC Index than the total sample. Younger women and those with operative births also reported significantly lower QMNC Indexes. Interpretation: Mothers reports revealed large inequities in QMNC across countries of the WHO European Region. Quality improvement initiatives to reduce these inequities and promote evidence-based, patient-centred respectful care for all mothers and newborns during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond are urgently needed. Funding: The study was financially supported by the Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy. Study registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04847336
AB - Background: Multi-country studies assessing the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) during the COVID-19 pandemic, as defined by WHO Standards, are lacking. Methods: Women who gave birth in 12 countries of the WHO European Region from March 1, 2020 - March 15, 2021 answered an online questionnaire, including 40 WHO Standard-based Quality Measures. Findings: 21,027 mothers were included in the analysis. Among those who experienced labour (N=18,063), 41·8% (26·1%- 63·5%) experienced difficulties in accessing antenatal care, 62% (12·6%-99·0%) were not allowed a companion of choice, 31·1% (16·5%-56·9%) received inadequate breastfeeding support, 34·4% (5·2%-64·8%) reported that health workers were not always using protective personal equipment, and 31·8% (17·8%-53·1%) rated the health workers’ number as “insufficient”. Episiotomy was performed in 20·1% (6·1%-66·0%) of spontaneous vaginal births and fundal pressure applied in 41·2% (11·5% -100%) of instrumental vaginal births. In addition, 23·9% women felt they were not treated with dignity (12·8%-59·8%), 12·5% (7·0%-23·4%) suffered abuse, and 2·4% (0·1%-26·2%) made informal payments. Most findings were significantly worse among women with prelabour caesarean birth (N=2,964). Multivariate analyses confirmed significant differences among countries, with Croatia, Romania, Serbia showing significant lower QMNC Indexes and Luxemburg showing a significantly higher QMNC Index than the total sample. Younger women and those with operative births also reported significantly lower QMNC Indexes. Interpretation: Mothers reports revealed large inequities in QMNC across countries of the WHO European Region. Quality improvement initiatives to reduce these inequities and promote evidence-based, patient-centred respectful care for all mothers and newborns during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond are urgently needed. Funding: The study was financially supported by the Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy. Study registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04847336
KW - COVID-19
KW - European Region
KW - Facility
KW - Maternal
KW - Newborn
KW - Quality of care
KW - Questionnaire
KW - Respectful maternity care
KW - Survey
KW - WHO
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121585834&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100268
DO - 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100268
M3 - Article
C2 - 34977838
AN - SCOPUS:85121585834
SN - 2666-7762
VL - 13
JO - The Lancet Regional Health. Europe
JF - The Lancet Regional Health. Europe
M1 - 100268
ER -