Tribal vs. integrative pluralism. Religious freedom: levee or driver of new fundamentalisms?

Teresa Bartolomei

doi:10.4067/S0718-92732023000100117

Tribal vs. integrative pluralism. Religious freedom: levee or driver of new fundamentalisms?

Teresa Bartolomei^*

^*Autor correspondente para este trabalho

Resultado de pesquisa › revisão de pares

1 Citação (Scopus)

26 Transferências (Pure)

Resumo

If the paradigm of secularization as replacement was falsified by the permanent vitality of the religious dimension on the world horizon and in the public sphere, the universalization of the paradigm of secularization as differentiation, on the contrary, turns out to be an essential guarantee of the maintenance and promotion of the rule of law and human rights. From an alternative perspective to both secularism and fundamentalism, public theology today is therefore called upon to reconstruct and argumentatively justify the function of religious freedom as a basic principle of democratic society, within the framework of cognitive and normative disjunction between religion and citizenship which rules modernity. It is urgent to theologically demystify the regressive manipulation of this principle, as a vector of a democratically disruptive tribal pluralism, in contradiction with its nature as a catalyst for an integrative pluralism essential for social cohesion and the common good.

Idioma original	English
Páginas (de-até)	117-145
Número de páginas	29
Revista	Veritas
Número de emissão	54
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-92732023000100117
Estado da publicação	Publicado - abr. 2023
Evento	VII Simpósio Luso-Brasileiro de Estudos de Religião: Religião, mobilidade e cidadania - Unversidade Católica Portuguesa, Braga Duração: 27 jan. 2021 → 29 jan. 2021

ODS da ONU

Este resultado contribui para o(s) seguinte(s) Objetivo(s) de Desenvolvimento Sustentável

ODS 16 Paz, justiça e instituições fortes

Acesso ao documento

10.4067/S0718-92732023000100117Licença:

71496866Final published version, 278 KBLicença:

http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/41355Licença:

Outros arquivos e links

Link to publication in Scopus

CITER: Research Centre for Theology and Religious Studies
Boas, A. V. (PI), Palma, A. (Investigador), Teixeira, A. (Investigador), Lamelas, I. (Investigador), Duque, J. M. (Investigador), Carvalho, J. (Investigador), Angélico, J. P. L. (Investigador), Coutinho, J. P. (Investigador), Teixeira, J. R. (Investigador), Rodrigues, L. M. F. (Investigador), Bartolomei, T. (Investigador), Martins, A. (Investigador), Messias, T. (Investigador), Correia, J. A. (Investigador), Almendra, L. M. (Investigador), Varanda, M. I. P. (Investigador), Rodrigues, L. M. F. (Investigador), Carvalho, J. (Investigador), Franca, M. (Investigador), Koncz, L. (Investigador), Pereira, A. (Investigador), Carvalho, C. S. (Investigador), Dinis, F. (Investigador), Boareto, J. A. (Investigador), Serrato, A. C. (Investigador), Martins, A. (Investigador), Arêas, C. (Investigador), Candiotto, C. (Investigador), Wehr, C. (Investigador), Schliesser, C. (Investigador), Dickinson, C. (Investigador), Cuda, E. (Investigador), Ausloos, H. (Investigador), Candiotto, J. D. F. (Investigador), Julien, J. (Investigador), Zeferino, J. (Investigador), Oliveira, J. (Investigador), Provinciatto, L. G. (Investigador), Almendra, L. M. (Investigador), Dietrich, L. J. (Investigador), Bingemer, M. C. (Investigador), Gomes, P. V. (Investigador), von Sinner, R. (Investigador), Caldeira, S. (Investigador), Dimas, S. (Investigador), Obirek, S. (Investigador), Vilas Boas , S. D. S. (Investigador) & Neto, T. (Investigador)
1/01/20 → 31/12/25
Projeto

Citação

@article{aebfa20af8f244afaf8bf4666913940a,

title = "Tribal vs. integrative pluralism. Religious freedom: levee or driver of new fundamentalisms?",

abstract = "If the paradigm of secularization as replacement was falsified by the permanent vitality of the religious dimension on the world horizon and in the public sphere, the universalization of the paradigm of secularization as differentiation, on the contrary, turns out to be an essential guarantee of the maintenance and promotion of the rule of law and human rights. From an alternative perspective to both secularism and fundamentalism, public theology today is therefore called upon to reconstruct and argumentatively justify the function of religious freedom as a basic principle of democratic society, within the framework of cognitive and normative disjunction between religion and citizenship which rules modernity. It is urgent to theologically demystify the regressive manipulation of this principle, as a vector of a democratically disruptive tribal pluralism, in contradiction with its nature as a catalyst for an integrative pluralism essential for social cohesion and the common good.",

keywords = "Citizenship, J. C. Murray, La{\"i}cit{\'e}, Religious fundamentalism, Religious liberty, Secularization",

author = "Teresa Bartolomei",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 Pontificio Seminario Mayor San Rafael. All rights reserved.; VII Simp{\'o}sio Luso-Brasileiro de Estudos de Religi{\~a}o: Religi{\~a}o, mobilidade e cidadania ; Conference date: 27-01-2021 Through 29-01-2021",

year = "2023",

month = apr,

doi = "10.4067/S0718-92732023000100117",

language = "English",

pages = "117--145",

journal = "Veritas",

issn = "0717-4675",

publisher = "Pontificio Seminario Mayor San Rafael",

number = "54",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tribal vs. integrative pluralism. Religious freedom

T2 - VII Simpósio Luso-Brasileiro de Estudos de Religião: Religião, mobilidade e cidadania

AU - Bartolomei, Teresa

PY - 2023/4

Y1 - 2023/4

N2 - If the paradigm of secularization as replacement was falsified by the permanent vitality of the religious dimension on the world horizon and in the public sphere, the universalization of the paradigm of secularization as differentiation, on the contrary, turns out to be an essential guarantee of the maintenance and promotion of the rule of law and human rights. From an alternative perspective to both secularism and fundamentalism, public theology today is therefore called upon to reconstruct and argumentatively justify the function of religious freedom as a basic principle of democratic society, within the framework of cognitive and normative disjunction between religion and citizenship which rules modernity. It is urgent to theologically demystify the regressive manipulation of this principle, as a vector of a democratically disruptive tribal pluralism, in contradiction with its nature as a catalyst for an integrative pluralism essential for social cohesion and the common good.

AB - If the paradigm of secularization as replacement was falsified by the permanent vitality of the religious dimension on the world horizon and in the public sphere, the universalization of the paradigm of secularization as differentiation, on the contrary, turns out to be an essential guarantee of the maintenance and promotion of the rule of law and human rights. From an alternative perspective to both secularism and fundamentalism, public theology today is therefore called upon to reconstruct and argumentatively justify the function of religious freedom as a basic principle of democratic society, within the framework of cognitive and normative disjunction between religion and citizenship which rules modernity. It is urgent to theologically demystify the regressive manipulation of this principle, as a vector of a democratically disruptive tribal pluralism, in contradiction with its nature as a catalyst for an integrative pluralism essential for social cohesion and the common good.

KW - Citizenship

KW - J. C. Murray

KW - Laïcité

KW - Religious fundamentalism

KW - Religious liberty

KW - Secularization

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85159902407

U2 - 10.4067/S0718-92732023000100117

DO - 10.4067/S0718-92732023000100117

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85159902407

SN - 0717-4675

SP - 117

EP - 145

JO - Veritas

JF - Veritas

IS - 54

Y2 - 27 January 2021 through 29 January 2021

ER -

Tribal vs. integrative pluralism. Religious freedom: levee or driver of new fundamentalisms?

Resumo

ODS da ONU

Acesso ao documento

Outros arquivos e links

Impressão digital

Projetos

CITER: Research Centre for Theology and Religious Studies

Citação