TY - JOUR
T1 - The paths to negative and positive experiences of informal caregiving in severe mental illness
T2 - a study of explanatory models
AU - Campos, Luísa
AU - Cardoso, Carlos Mota
AU - Marques-Teixeira, João
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: This research was funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, grant number (SFRH/BD/13508/2003). The publication of this manuscript was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (UID/CED/04872/2019).
Funding Information:
Data collection followed ethical guidelines, with all participants signing an informed consent form. The sociodemographic form and questionnaire were self‐administered by participants, who were almost all involved in the Association of Families of People with Mental Illness. The study presented in this paper is part of a doctoral thesis approved at the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences of the Universidade do Porto and funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BD/13508/2003), approved and monitored in accordance with all the requirements demanded for research (Ethics Committee of Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences of the University of Porto 2019/07‐4).
Funding Information:
This research was funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, grant number (SFRH/BD/13508/2003). The publication of this manuscript was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (UID/CED/04872/2019). The authors would like to thank Luís Azevedo and Cláudia Camila (Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto), who carried out the data analyses, for their support; and the informal caregivers and associations of families of people with mental illness where the data were collected.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - The experience of caregiving in severe mental illness is a valuable concept for research and clinical practice as it can provide access to the idiosyncratic assessment of negative and positive dimensions of informal caregiving, thus allowing the design of interventions focused on reducing risk factors and promoting protective factors. This study was aimed at testing explanatory models of negative and positive experiences of caregiving considering the role of the caregiver’s perceptions of difficulties, satisfaction, and coping. A convenience sample of 159 informal caregivers of patients with schizophrenia was used in this study. Different variables were considered: (1) perception of difficulties (Caregiver’s Assessment of Difficulties Index); (2) perception of satisfaction (Caregiver’s Assessment of Satisfaction Index); (3) perception of coping (Caregiver’s Assessment of Managing Index); and (4) the experience of caregiving (Experience of Caregiving Inventory). Using structural equation modeling, the results revealed the following: (1) the perception of difficulties and of satisfaction coexist; (2) the negative experiences of caregiving are predominantly explained by the perception of difficulties and of coping with stress; and (3) the positive experiences of caregiving are mainly explained by the perception of sources of intrapersonal satisfaction, while the perception of coping does not have robust predictive value.
AB - The experience of caregiving in severe mental illness is a valuable concept for research and clinical practice as it can provide access to the idiosyncratic assessment of negative and positive dimensions of informal caregiving, thus allowing the design of interventions focused on reducing risk factors and promoting protective factors. This study was aimed at testing explanatory models of negative and positive experiences of caregiving considering the role of the caregiver’s perceptions of difficulties, satisfaction, and coping. A convenience sample of 159 informal caregivers of patients with schizophrenia was used in this study. Different variables were considered: (1) perception of difficulties (Caregiver’s Assessment of Difficulties Index); (2) perception of satisfaction (Caregiver’s Assessment of Satisfaction Index); (3) perception of coping (Caregiver’s Assessment of Managing Index); and (4) the experience of caregiving (Experience of Caregiving Inventory). Using structural equation modeling, the results revealed the following: (1) the perception of difficulties and of satisfaction coexist; (2) the negative experiences of caregiving are predominantly explained by the perception of difficulties and of coping with stress; and (3) the positive experiences of caregiving are mainly explained by the perception of sources of intrapersonal satisfaction, while the perception of coping does not have robust predictive value.
KW - Experience of caregiving
KW - Informal caregivers
KW - Schizophrenia
KW - Severe mental illness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072577238&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/ijerph16193530
DO - 10.3390/ijerph16193530
M3 - Article
C2 - 31547218
AN - SCOPUS:85072577238
SN - 1661-7827
VL - 16
JO - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
IS - 19
M1 - 3530
ER -