Why does performance management not perform?

Miguel Pina e Cunha, Daniel Veiga Vieira, Arménio Rego*, Stewart Clegg

*Autor correspondente para este trabalho

Resultado de pesquisarevisão de pares

17 Citações (Scopus)

Resumo

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to ask why poor performance management practices persist in Portugal, in the middle of claims to increase productivity. Design/methodology/approach: An inductive micro-practice analysis is used to understand barriers to management practice that do not require massive institutional changes. Findings: The practice of performance management in Portugal typically displays three weaknesses: (1) insufficient planning (2) process and integrity issues, and (3) a non-meritocratic logic. Research limitations/implications: The paper discusses the important topic of persistence of bad practices, showing how institutionalized patterns might be difficult to eradicate even they are suboptimal. Practical implications: The authors identity key issues in the functioning of performance management, therefore helping managers in developing remedies to improve the quality of their practice. Originality/value: The paper explains the persistence of bad management practice whose continuity hinders not only organizations’ effectiveness but also that of their members.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (de-até)673-692
Número de páginas20
RevistaInternational Journal of Productivity and Performance Management
Volume67
Número de emissão4
DOIs
Estado da publicaçãoPublicado - 2018

Impressão digital

Mergulhe nos tópicos de investigação de “Why does performance management not perform?“. Em conjunto formam uma impressão digital única.

Citação